Overall: 12-9 (+2.325) RD 3: 1-4 (-11.575)
2:20 PM ET Day -180 over Kirk 3pts L 2:20 PM ET Glover -125 over Noh 2.5pts Push 2:50 PM ET Howell -110 over An 2pts L 3:00 PM ET Berger -130 over Lovemark 2pts L 3:10 PM ET Vegas -135 over Stuard 2.5pts L
Day supported by undefeated third round trend. The rest are all supported by strong third round trends.
5Dimes RD 3: 1:20 PM ET Appleby -120 over Ogilvy 2pts W Supported by strong Third round trends. 5Dimes RD 2: 3-2 (+2.7)
5:10 PM ET Senden -135 over Taylor 2.5pts W
5:30 PM ET Woodland -115 over Noh 3pts W
5:40 PM ET Goosen -135 over Streb 2.5pts L
5:40 PM ET Howell -195 over Collins 1.5pts L
Woodland supported by multiple undefeated trends. The rest supported by very strong second round trends. 5Dimes
RD 2: 5:10 PM ET Berger -160 over Langley 3.5pts W
Supported by multiple undefeated trends. Several more plays coming.
5Dimes RD 1 Afternoon: 8-3 (+11.2)
1:00 PM ET Kelly +110 over Donaldson 1.5pts W
1:00 PM ET Kizzire -120 over Glover 2pts W
1:20 PM ET Wilcox +100 over Lovemark 2pts L
1:30 PM ET Henley +105 over Kirk 2.5pts W
1:40 PM ET Mahan -135 over Todd 2.5pts W
1:50 PM ET Horschel +135 over Rose 1.5pts W
All supported by strong first round trends.
5Dimes RD 1:
8:10 AM ET Berger -180 over Langley 2.5pts W 8:40 AM ET Woodland -140 over Noh 1.5pts L 9:00 AM ET Goosen -105 over Streb 1.5pts W 9:10 AM ET Howell -175 over Collins 2.5pts W 9:30 AM ET Molder +105 over Rodgers 2pts L
All supported by strong first round trends.
5Dimes |
TIPPING STRATEGY
My strategy is based on several different theories, which I
have outlined below. It is also 99% based on numbers. Every play I post is
supported by some form of numbers, not what I think should happen.
1) History repeats itself. The large majority of
tournaments each year are played on the same course. And while the players
change, the stats and power rankings that predict success on each course
typically do not. And this is where trends are helpful. (Trends are very
helpful for tournaments with new courses as well)
• The trends that I
use are specific to each round of each tournament. I use approximately 40
different player stats and approximately 50 different power rankings. These
stats and power rankings are for an 8 week period and a 4 week period, and
are also weighted. The win/loss record of each of these stats and power
rankings are accumulated from the three previous years of each tournament.
The average sample size is no less than a 100 head to head matchups for each
round.
2) It is my belief that individual sports provide
the greatest opportunity for playing underdogs. Therefore, determining which
underdogs have the most value can be highly profitable.
• In regards to golf, if an individual has a bad day, he
does not have any teammates to pick up the slack. In addition, betting lines
for the world’s top players are often grossly inflated in order to balance
the action. And even the world’s top players have bad days or extended
periods of bad play. The models I have created and are continuing to develop
(regression analysis) allow me to find high value underdogs.
3) More to come……
STAKING PLAN
My plays are based upon a percentage of my starting bankroll
each season. They range from 1% to 8%, with the large majority ranging from
3% to 5%. In order to stay consistent with my fellow tipsters here on
TourTips, I have converted my % system to a points system. 1% is equal to
0.5pts. Therefore, a 3% play equals 1.5pts, a 5% play equals 2.5pts, etc.
|