RD 4 Add: 11:50 AM ET Matsuyama -125 over Reed 3pts 12:30 PM ET Hoffman -125 over Lovemark 3pts 12:50 PM ET Oosthuizen -160 over Watney 3pts 2:00 PM ET Bradley +100 over DeChambeau 3pts 5Dimes RD 4:
11:30 AM ET Stuard +125 over Uihlein 3pts
5Dimes
More coming
RD 3:
10:50 AM ET Bradley -115 over Putnam 3pts 11:10 AM ET Piercy -135 over Stuard 3pts 11:40 AM ET Saunders +150 over Watson 3pts 1:00 PM ET Finau -105 over Mickelson 3pts 2:00 PM ET Koepka -.5 -186 over Lovemark 2.5pts
5Dimes
RD 2 Afternoon: 12:00 PM ET Tway -105 over Lovemark 2.5pts 12:22 PM ET Pan -115 over Walker 2.5pts 12:33 PM ET Z Johnson -130 over Smith 2pts 12:44 PM ET Bradley -135 over Gay 2pts 1:06 PM ET D Johnson -125 over Koepka 2pts 1:39 PM ET Lee -125 over Watney 2.5pts 5Dimes RD 2:
9:00 AM ET Blaum -115 over Stuard 2pts
5 Dimes
Aftrrnoon plays up around noon ET.
RD 1 Afternoon: 12:11 PM ET Hahn +110 over Uihlein 2pts 12:22 PM ET Garnett +105 over Hadwin 2pts 12:33 PM ET Horschel +105 over Noren 2pts 12:55 PM ET Finau -105 over Reed 2pts 1:28 PM ET Sabbatini +115 over Schwartzel 2pts 1:39 PM ET Blaum -120 over Brown 2pts 5Dimes RD 1:
7:32 AM ET Z Johnson -160 over Smith 2pts 8:05 AM ET D Johnson -125 over Koepka 2pts 8:38 AM ET Lee -120 over Watney 2pts 9:00 AM ET Ryder +120 over Laird 2pts
5Dimes
Afternoon plays up by 12 PM ET |
TIPPING STRATEGY
My strategy is based on several different theories, which I
have outlined below. It is also 99% based on numbers. Every play I post is
supported by some form of numbers, not what I think should happen.
1) History repeats itself. The large majority of
tournaments each year are played on the same course. And while the players
change, the stats and power rankings that predict success on each course
typically do not. And this is where trends are helpful. (Trends are very
helpful for tournaments with new courses as well)
• The trends that I
use are specific to each round of each tournament. I use approximately 40
different player stats and approximately 50 different power rankings. These
stats and power rankings are for an 8 week period and a 4 week period, and
are also weighted. The win/loss record of each of these stats and power
rankings are accumulated from the three previous years of each tournament.
The average sample size is no less than a 100 head to head matchups for each
round.
2) It is my belief that individual sports provide
the greatest opportunity for playing underdogs. Therefore, determining which
underdogs have the most value can be highly profitable.
• In regards to golf, if an individual has a bad day, he
does not have any teammates to pick up the slack. In addition, betting lines
for the world’s top players are often grossly inflated in order to balance
the action. And even the world’s top players have bad days or extended
periods of bad play. The models I have created and are continuing to develop
(regression analysis) allow me to find high value underdogs.
3) More to come……
STAKING PLAN
My plays are based upon a percentage of my starting bankroll
each season. They range from 1% to 8%, with the large majority ranging from
3% to 5%. In order to stay consistent with my fellow tipsters here on
TourTips, I have converted my % system to a points system. 1% is equal to
0.5pts. Therefore, a 3% play equals 1.5pts, a 5% play equals 2.5pts, etc.
|